From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 12 01:34:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F2F16A41A for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6752F13C44B for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA811B471D6 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:19:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68716-03 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:19:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AE6B47198 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:19:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26869EB6C3 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:19:16 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:18:34 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20011EE14844381044655F4D@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: wireless recommendations ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:34:44 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person", so, of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ... ... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do we support *well*? The machine(s) are going to be remote, so I'd like to go with something that is generally felt to be 'consistently reliable' vs 'cheap' ... or, at least, somewhere in the middle ground would be nice :) - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHDstq4QvfyHIvDvMRAv53AJ9EErGuuWQN4QZNWHrQ0zt7Qw9O4gCfVZSt 0t0f+CdyKvNtdlZnEJcRVYY= =5B0B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----