From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 19:08:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1392A16A41F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:08:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D6343D45 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:07:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2994CB3C; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:08:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570164C70B; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:08:18 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <435A8E0C.9070705@roq.com> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:07:56 +1000 From: Michael VInce User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051019 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Poland References: <20051020223340.GA60914@xor.obsecurity.org> <43581E5C.4010006@polands.org> <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051020.220346.13027284.imp@bsdimp.com> <20051021170042.GA95367@polands.org> In-Reply-To: <20051021170042.GA95367@polands.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:08:00 -0000 Doug Poland wrote: >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:03:46PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > >>In message: <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org> >> Kris Kennaway writes: >> >> >>>On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:11:41PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I was seeing this behavior a lot on 5.2.1, 5.3, and, IIRC, 5.4. >>>>>>Responsiveness was so poor as to make remote SSH sessions >>>>>>unusable. When I installed -CURRENT then RELENG_6, then the NIC >>>>>>started performing beautifully. Very stable and consistent. >>>>>>Now, with yesterday's cvsup'd to RC1, the NIC/driver is >>>>>>performing poorly again. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>Go back to the previous version to verify it's not environmental >>>>>or some other problem than a regression in FreeBSD. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Sure, can you tell me what tag to use in my supfile? Right now I >>>>have: >>>> >>>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 >>>> >>>> >>>Use a date instead of a tag (see the cvsup docs). >>> >>> >>*default release=cvs date=2005.10.10.12.23.45 >> >>and try to find where, since June, the divergence of performance was. >>We branched RELENG_6 in June, and there's been much merged from head >>back into RELENG_6. >> >> >> >I've gone back to 2005.10.09.16.14.15, which was the time I installed >-BETA5. So far, the connection is more stable and robust: Here's my >diagnostics: > >Fri O > Strange, maybe its something else, such as power related? I have a WG511T and am on 6.0RC1 / AMD64 laptop, I haven't noticed any problems. I am using WPA mode via DHCP and have been using my laptop every day for the last week and the laptop has been running non-stop. Mike