Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:49:10 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: Kiswono Prayogo <kiswono@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File System Performance on FreeBSD Message-ID: <AANLkTik3GfBUhvZ3-WV-PQz4%2Bwc8A1NL_Kek-hmWtx%2Bi@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C5EE5CA.2090706@potentialtech.com> References: <4C5EB94F.509@gmail.com> <4C5EE5CA.2090706@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>wrote: > On 8/8/10 10:03:59 AM, Kiswono Prayogo wrote: > >> Is there any justification for this benchmark? >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=zfs_ext4_btrfs&num=2 >> <http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=zfs_ext4_btrfs&num=2>; >> > > I'm sure there are Linux people who will be shouting about this all > over the place. But to the casual observer, all this tells you is > that Linux's filesystems _may_ be faster for short, bursty work. > > Here's a more detailed explanation. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-June/032031.html -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTik3GfBUhvZ3-WV-PQz4%2Bwc8A1NL_Kek-hmWtx%2Bi>