From owner-freebsd-net Mon Nov 5 9: 4:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gvr.gvr.org (gvr.gvr.org [212.61.40.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6CF37B416 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by gvr.gvr.org (Postfix, from userid 657) id 70F6D5809; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:04:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:04:18 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij To: Mike Silbersack Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch regarding icmp bandwidth limiting Message-ID: <20011105180418.A32828@gvr.gvr.org> References: <20011105144330.A29038@gvr.gvr.org> <20011105102130.H29695-100000@achilles.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011105102130.H29695-100000@achilles.silby.com>; from silby@silby.com on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:42AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:42AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > The first number is the rate at which the machine would be responding > without limiting enabled. The second number tells you the rate at which > it is responding. Changing from a pre to a post increment isn't going to > change what you're seeing. > I was thinking the same, but still the message puzzled me. How about changing it from: Limiting icmp ping response to %d packet per second for %d received -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message