From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 29 15:44:18 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id PAA01957 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 15:44:18 -0700 Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA01936 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 15:44:16 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA00404 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 15:12:14 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id GAA04583; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 06:10:57 +0800 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 06:10:57 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tcl 7.4 / Tk 4.0 Ports In-Reply-To: <199507291153.EAA02399@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 29 Jul 1995, Satoshi Asami wrote: > > Ok, so now it's "release", but is it still incompatible? Yes, Ousterhout has said that Tk4.0 is the "do-it-right" release where he fixes fundamental problems that have existed since the earliest releases of Tk. Tk authors have been warned that existing apps *will* break and that they should be rewritten for 4.0. The changes to Tcl are more minor. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org