Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:24:58 +0200 From: Dmitriy Borisov <borik@ints.net> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 Message-ID: <200311062124.58617.borik@ints.net> In-Reply-To: <16298.27926.308949.557331@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031105173546.00aeabd8@pop.courtesymortgage.com> <87ad79jzxc.fsf@strauser.com> <16298.27926.308949.557331@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 6 November 2003 17:47, Robert Huff wrote: > Kirk Strauser writes: > > > How stable is 5.1 for production servers? > > > > I switched my personal server (which runs multiple jails and sees > > more traffic than some of the servers I've worked with > > professionally) to 5.0 over the summer and have been building > > world once a month or so. Other than some short-term problems > > with ATAng that seem to be fixed, I haven't had any problems at > > all. > > On the other hand, for me 5.x/-CURRENT has been more trouble > than (the initial installations within) 2, 3, and 4 put together. > (And I'm not pushing it that hard.) Something else just broke > today. I have 5.1 RELEASE cvsuped to RELENG_5_1 and I havn`t troubles with it. But I had more than more troubles with 5-CURENT (troubles begins from building kernel and hasn`t finished anywhere :) -- Bets regards, Dmitriy Borisov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311062124.58617.borik>