From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Oct 25 07:23:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B730168B2C for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46zwZq0vlwz49y5 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1D503168B2B; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D126168B29 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46zwZp74qCz49y4 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA6B2303C for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9P7Nk5p021571 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9P7Nk0H021453 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241463] [NEW PORT] devel/scons-py3: scons for python3 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc flagtypes.name keywords bug_status short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:23:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241463 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |sunpoet@FreeBSD.org CC| |koobs@FreeBSD.org Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(sunpoe | |t@FreeBSD.org) Keywords|patch |feature, needs-qa Status|New |Open Summary|new port: devel/scons-py3: |[NEW PORT] devel/scons-py3: |scons slave port for |scons for python3 |python3 | --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- Though I understand the motivation for this port proposal, we'd prefer not = to add py2/3 specific ports, because: - Python ports should always allow *any* Python version to be used for the build that the upstream supports. Any Python port unnecessarily restricting= the declared version support is considered a bug. - All else being equal, there ought to be no work required for 'specificall= y' or explicitly flavouring any Python port, and instead leverage the automatic flavouring that is produced solely by declaring the versions that the softw= are *supports*. Perhaps scons is differerent, but in that case, we should understand where and how, and seek to aim our effort toward addressing those questions rather than creating a potentially very short lived port that has limited utility, and comes with downsides. - It breaks with the conventions/mechanism that we have developed to allow arbitrary user-selection of their preferred Python version, while minimising conflicts between packages. We should resolve any barriers/issues with the main scons port not allowing= , or not being currently appropriate for building with Python 3.x. Could you please add any relevant scons issue ID's to this bugs See Also fi= eld --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=