Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:24:16 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Jim Harris <jimharris@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r244549 - head/sys/dev/nvme Message-ID: <201212211424.16934.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201212211913.qBLJDmpm019837@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201212211913.qBLJDmpm019837@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, December 21, 2012 2:13:48 pm Jim Harris wrote: > Author: jimharris > Date: Fri Dec 21 19:13:48 2012 > New Revision: 244549 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244549 > > Log: > Put kthreads under curproc so they are attached to nvmecontrol rather > than pid 0. > > Sponsored by: Intel Hmm, is this really wise? I'm not sure how well the kernel would handle a kthread belonging to a userland process. You could just have each test create a new kproc that holds the associated threads for that test instead perhaps? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201212211424.16934.jhb>