From owner-freebsd-small Sat Jan 29 20:42:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A315303; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:42:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id PAA56440; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:12:09 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:12:09 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Andrzej Bialecki , Michael Larsen , Roger Hardiman , small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PicoBSD changes for 4.0-current Message-ID: <20000130151208.J55643@freebie.lemis.com> References: <20000130132119.A55643@freebie.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday, 29 January 2000 at 20:41:01 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > >> Given the recent discussion about maintainers in general, I think we >> should only have maintainers for those products where one person does >> the bulk (> 75%) of the work. I don't think PicoBSD fits into this >> category, so I'd suggest that we don't have a maintainer. > > How about MAINTAINER = freebsd-small, then, to indicate that changes > should be passed by this list? Sounds like a good idea. I think we probably need a comment in there to explain what it means. Do you want to commit it? Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message