From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 24 16:33:38 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7AB106568C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:33:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE178FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:33:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 5E3555C2D; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:33:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:33:38 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080924163338.GA9540@atarininja.org>
References: <8cb6106e0809240828v3ebe1095w898597fea2d40272@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080924160633.GC30745@atarininja.org>
	<8cb6106e0809240925i5d7ad067o21cc680bd800cc9f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0809240925i5d7ad067o21cc680bd800cc9f@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new reconfig-recursive target for ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:33:39 -0000

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:48PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote:
> > Seems like a rare case where someone would want to re-visit (in this
> > manner) options they have already set.  That said, it may come in handy.
> 
> Yeah, I figured it can't *hurt* and might come in handy in a few
> circumstances.

I'd submit it as a PR for portmgr to handle.  Understandably they are
busy handling other things but you can at least get it on their radar.

I've had some stuff pending portmgr for a while now so patience is
necessary for little updates like this.  There are almost always higher
priorities.

-- WXS