From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 07:09:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7116A4CE; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.russia.cz (web.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1E43D4C; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:09:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from portaone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.russia.cz (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3LE9Lb1003229; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:09:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <4086808B.9020308@portaone.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:09:15 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ru, uk MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <200404181922.i3IJMkTf044706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040419032304.GA61048@regency.nsu.ru> <20040419103101.GB26102@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040419110810.GA24385@regency.nsu.ru> <20040420200903.GA6174@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040421094050.GA5052@FreeBSD.org> <40864E82.90904@portaone.com> <20040421130214.GC5052@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Alexey Dokuchaev cc: Clement Laforet cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Eivind Eklund cc: David O'Brien cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: files/patch-* pathname separators X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:09:53 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Eivind Eklund writes: > >>I also tend to like the ::-convention, as it is the same separator as >>used in various programming languages (Ruby, Perl, C++, etc) and thus >>already is in the "separator" slot in my mind. However, in private mail >>David referred to a previous discussion that he said had resulted in a >>decision against it. Is there anybody out there that agree with David >>in this? > > > All previous discussions of which I am aware ended with ports people > saying "this is how we do things" and David objecting strenuously. If Exactly my impression. -Maxim > David thinks otherwise, he should provide relevant references to > archived threads. Or he could just save us all (and himself) a lot of > grief, stop worrying, and learn to love the bomb. > > DES