From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 04:36:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D94106564A; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127BF8FC0C; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 04:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so414pzk.13 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:36:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HYCsqaI2KKhMWFJJxeXLvQFo6fEJaU58Wde2f/i2sHE=; b=jB3k8bfnOt4MUGDMBPjCRvsr16iW3dDvV1ouupVGq+c20eP08NyYmsdDMxpuVE3kDA Gzc8q3fASruZ4WUUpvjS2BzhTRk30y92wVGNLS/UpQLCuHpbQUMHB1frjYMpZTEvF9Gz ivDrNz+b41N5mNps0LwIkcR1IIAPG7r6SxwGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rzEFswhDYiljbZzmafbiexjZ6MGYElrQUoBcafLermyuFqMIL5dEBX1NQIoDCEA870 Q57okmAb7/a7I1FO8C+YIiwTtHMIzxyyeaAPyNsADbFdBXbWMhF5VXojlHs6B4bZvdti YW6YNkBuF5tY0pypkt+F9xDD8GR+UrbifPsto= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.237.20 with SMTP id k20mr7526626wfh.170.1301978181452; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.42.3 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:36:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D9A9AF5.9020807@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110404141016.GL71940@rincewind.paeps.cx> <4D9A0836.7070403@FreeBSD.org> <4D9A9AF5.9020807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:36:21 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating PCI vendors database X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 04:36:22 -0000 On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/04/2011 20:30, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> 1. People may have automation that depends on this output. > > To the extent that they rely on information that is out of date, fixing this > is a feature. However I cannot imagine that this would be much of an issue. > >> 2. Some braindead SCMs may be problematic with this change (p4?*COUGH*). > > Eh? I don't parse this. perforce doesn't always grok large changes (especially deletions -- it gets ditzy). The last change that was committed by someone at $WORK to this file was several thousand lines long, and that was just additions IIRC. Thanks, -Garrett