From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 15:31:53 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BA116A41F
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:31:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E786743D58
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:31:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBFFVn4Q019939;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:31:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10])
	by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP
	id 58310-01-2; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:31:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBFFSxRc019824
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:28:59 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) id jBFFT6NM039320;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:29:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:29:05 +0200
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Message-ID: <20051215152905.GH51686@ip.net.ua>
References: <021001c60003$6528ea80$1ec237c0@nms.noc.utoronto.ca>
	<FCCA8DCC-EB0F-46F9-A8D6-8568EEC60730@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FCCA8DCC-EB0F-46F9-A8D6-8568EEC60730@mac.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua
Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Jin Fang <jin.fang@utoronto.ca>
Subject: Re: ipfw table bad command
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:31:53 -0000


--Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:41:08PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Jin Fang wrote:
> >Which version of freebsd has 'table' command been implemented into =20
> >ipfw?
> >I try it in 5.2.1 to use:
> ># ipfw table 1 add x.x.x.x/32
> >get:
> >ipfw: bad command `table'
>=20
> It was added somewhere around 5.3.  Someone running 5.2.1 should =20
> update to 5.3, 5.4, or consider going to 6.0...
>=20
Wrong.  I committed ipfw tables support in sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c#1.60
while RELENG_5_BP is 1.70.  That is, all of 5.>0 kernels should have
it.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDoYvBqRfpzJluFF4RAhH0AJ9fYXihTWytkDciBBA/07eYdbNnbQCePlps
jo1ZirqxXspg19P6yMP2k4w=
=F+jZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Zs/RYxT/hKAHzkfQ--