From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 23:26:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1DA16A44D; Sat, 13 May 2006 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9946143D69; Sat, 13 May 2006 23:26:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-102-190.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.102.190]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 May 2006 19:27:34 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,125,1146456000"; d="scan'208"; a="203470233:sNHT3284484308" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17510.27078.247713.155937@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:20:38 -0400 To: Shaun Amott In-Reply-To: <20060513203946.GA2050@picobyte.net> References: <20060513203946.GA2050@picobyte.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: fbsd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:26:50 -0000 Shaun Amott writes: > cvsup uses a relatively tiny amount of bandwidth, since only > changes are being sent. Personally, I have a local cvsup mirror > from which my other machines get their updates, so really, there > isn't any wastage. Back when I had a 28.8 dialup connection, I updated the ports tree daily. No hassle; no sweat. Distfiles, now were a different matter .... Robert Huff