From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 25 21:17:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from i.caniserv.com (i.caniserv.com [139.142.95.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A3071501A for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 21:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Darcy@ok-connect.com) Received: (qmail 20411 invoked from network); 26 May 1999 04:17:29 -0000 Received: from ccliii.caniserv.com (HELO dbitech) (darcyb@139.142.95.253) by 139.142.95.10 with SMTP; 26 May 1999 04:17:29 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990525211912.022d46d0@mail.ok-connect.com> X-Sender: darcyb@mail.ok-connect.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:19:12 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Darcy Buskermolen Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:00 PM 5/25/99 -0700, you wrote: > Anything else is merely be an >idealized representation of reality and hence not of much concern. > >- Jordan > As I can agree with all the developers on the issue at hand, as a development community we require at least a bare minimum of quality information to be able to handel the "it's broke fix it" phenomenon. But having said this I don't think that we need to waste as many bits of bandwidth in pounding this issue into the ground. The "official word" from the FreeBSD development team has said so now can we please drop this whole thread and get back to constructive work. Just my 2 cents worth. Cudos to the Whole dev team: Thanks for all your hard work and perseverance , as well as your tolerance for people who start threads like this. Keep up the GOOD WORK. //DB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message