From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 18:43:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343DB5F3 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13AFD2DE6 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3FEFA6D86BCC; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:43:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:43:19 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: what's the story with openssl? Message-ID: <20141228184319.GA84504@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:43:21 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, This seems like it should be an unbelievably stupid question. But I guess FreeBSD's idea of sane defaults for openssl do not accord with my idea of sane defaults for openssl. I have tried the security/ca_root_nss port now both with and without the option to create the link in /etc. It doesn't help. Why am I having to specify --ca-certificate /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt to make wget work? What do I have to do to make this not necessary--and *stay* not necessary? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUoE9GAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr+qkP/Rlc6C6jgffxcU2xBXeVJ4/v Gnjc33Vbxor/raW2pO/ZjIgGGAAtgKF8yuqT41SxxXkSulBfUvQZ3Ir3EXsJxGLL kWXP6rFJRzBk5jTTzpvVwad2woP8Ml6WYM7b2grVX+X+0D7VYq517zWrsp95V9+p c9CCQbW0vgk5UvJlRivz7NVNkF0p1Rj232emeojQF5cPup6Q7L2ifRIzMA6jRJJ+ M6aLCWKwegVxvMnTi+PSoHti73F/pLRz8fzlWQ20r7K67b6pxFrsAYeJ+99I0Vxt 89XXLu5ZPzOxgEgum/mJGoGNsQx+xC6HCk/0bMuaWT01N3snN21tTanrNyzZGvBP cHja3TEKsHuVM3da7sF730kFmhNRVQNx8VN8zpBm86E+kqeVkzFhookeAGVq9dAf 6CAnF2AkiCp4sNHzNIYbwLJiwU4DexO9RPznLtf2UlWYSuoSwFbsLkaHBx2XhFkT F8BhFXWQSGWhr4Nefiv9b6QZPrQm1XhmRT/fQb7N8tc5J4m/piH+9j4iiFFRMGpF WiaU70JDhx5gopvx5zmonU1GKcQt1JsIUI994dqT8/CZ7EUvlKzqhRUxSh9/2dIy S9eMYD4z6y4sHkIG2nqbvXQlnzYi+6+jHTFDPqOLIXgbgqzMehs7ix3qmtH2az6m 9Rywmw9X6GT9ZuoV4Qc2 =65JZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--