From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jul 17 4:10:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ADF37B401 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 04:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heresy.dreamflow.nl (heresy.dreamflow.nl [62.58.36.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E97443E75 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 04:10:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bart@dreamflow.nl) Received: (qmail 40750 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Jul 2002 11:10:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:10:29 +0200 From: Bart Matthaei To: "Carroll, D. (Danny)" Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and it's glory... Message-ID: <20020717111029.GA40276@heresy.dreamflow.nl> References: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5359@citsnl045.europe.intranet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C506EA550443D44A061432F1E92EA4C6C5359@citsnl045.europe.intranet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Carroll, D. (Danny) wrote: > I disagree with te 1024-65535 rules. > In my experience you can get it to work without allowing all of these. Some things tend to break when you leave it out. I can't give you any examples atm, since I don't recall them :) > Plus the way you have it setup, if you ever have X running then port > 6000 is open and I really hate that idea. Then add deny rules for port 6000 :) Cheers, Bart -- Bart Matthaei bart@dreamflow.nl If at first you don't succeed, redefine success. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message