From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 01:43:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DAB106574E for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gm.nunu.org) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63A98FC0A for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gm.nunu.org) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so180797ana.13 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.67.15 with SMTP id u15mr2473245ank.136.1214617406919; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.70.3 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <626eb4530806271843w998770cg54d747663f9bbddc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:26 -0700 From: "Hidetoshi Shimokawa" Sender: freebsd@gm.nunu.org To: "Sean Bruno" In-Reply-To: <48659262.8080604@miralink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48659262.8080604@miralink.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0a692dff27434cc9 Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fwcontrol failure with multiple firewire cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:43:29 -0000 To handle multiple card, you need '-u' option to be the first argument if I remember correctly. I think adding new feature is ok but you should be careful to change the behavior . On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > I noted very strange behavior from all pieces of the firewire stack while > testing this week when there are multiple firewire cards in a machine. > Before I start submitting patches to fwcontrol/firewire for these issues, is > there any signifcant backwards compatibility issues I need to be concerned > about? > > Should I come up with a way to make fwcontrol behave normally unless there > is a new argument(eg -B to iterate over multiple cards)? Or is ok to trash > the old behavior in favor of one that understands multiple cards? > > Sean > > -- /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@FreeBSD.ORG