From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Nov 30 08:50:58 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2726BC5DDD5
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16D0119AB
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uAU8ovvV079219
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:50:57 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 202510] [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause double
 MASTER situations
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:50:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: dam@my.gd
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-202510-2472-lpFwmP3wyH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-202510-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-202510-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:50:58 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202510

--- Comment #5 from dam@my.gd ---
(In reply to Palle Girgensohn from comment #4)


Hello Palle,


Ah there may have been a small misunderstanding here.

My statement was more meant as a "the patch is made by a novice to RC and
network.subr, likely needs review/consensus from devs".

It didn't mean I was going to seek consensus -from the MLs for example- .

I thought someone from net@ would take the ticket, review the patch and ens=
ure
it doesn't introduce any regression.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=