From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 18 01:35:36 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C327D7BF
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:35:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9EE7669
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:35:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0I1Zav5045768
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:35:36 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196674] security/keepassx2 bus error on
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:35:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: ivan@brawley.id.au
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-196674-13-SvvLGwpRl8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196674-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196674-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:35:36 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196674

Ivan Brawley <ivan@brawley.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ivan@brawley.id.au

--- Comment #8 from Ivan Brawley <ivan@brawley.id.au> ---
I've been hit with the same bug with 10.1-RELEASE-p3.

Problem lies in the compiling of cipher/salsa20.c in libgcrypt and/or
keepassx's interaction with the libgcrypt salsa20 routines.

If you compile libgcrypt with "USE_GCC= any" set, keepassx works. If you use
the default CLANG's cc but with "CFLAGS= -O1", keepassx also works.

I've narrowed it down to compiling just the cipher/salsa20.c module in
libgcrypt with "-O1" and the rest with "-O2" will allow keepassx to work.

I've just sent an email to the new maintainer of libgcrypt with that
information (and ugly patch to port's Makefile) as well to consider.

Now the finger pointing.. Is it CLANG's optimizations or libgcrypt's salsa20
code or keepassx calling libgcrypt with bad data?

ivan.
(different ivan).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.