From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 09:31:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6016A420 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:31:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdlists@elitists.org) Received: from gv.elitists.org (gv.elitists.org [64.40.88.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7279A43D49 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdlists@elitists.org) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (h202.elitists.org [64.40.88.202]) by gv.elitists.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB881D85E for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 03:32:05 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43E1D187.3090007@elitists.org> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:31:51 -0600 From: "F. Even - fbsd-questions" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portsnap, excluding parts of the ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:31:51 -0000 I know I can run "portsnap extract sysutils/portupgrade" ...or something to that effect....but that will not "register" say for a "portsnap update" after a new "portsnap fetch". This is what I will get for an error if I try that: [root@gv:/usr/ports]$ portsnap update /usr/ports was not created by portsnap. You must run 'portsnap extract' before running 'portsnap update'. ...is there any way I can only maintain a small portion of the ports tree while still using portsnap (or should I not bother and just use cvsup)? I'd like to keep the parts of the ports collection around that I use, but not all of it...as this box has space issues. Thanks, Frank