From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb 29 12:40:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA05874
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA05853
          Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA00408; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602292038.MAA00408@precipice.shockwave.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
cc: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), stable@freebsd.org,
        current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPFW (was: Re: -stable hangs at boot) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:31:52 CST."
             <199602291731.LAA04770@brasil.moneng.mei.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 12:38:13 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Obligatory comment:

1597 space should *NEVER* be considered "more secure."

The only difference between 1597 space and non-1597 space is that 1597 space
is not guaranteed to be unique across the internet.

I can still get my packets through to (and often received from) a 1597 based
machine.