From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 22:01:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7D416A41F; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA5D43D48; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 22:01:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j75LxcKx056800; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:59:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:00:40 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050805.160040.84975093.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@haven.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <21291.1123262340@phk.freebsd.dk> References: <42F39E7F.50603@portaone.com> <21291.1123262340@phk.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 05 Aug 2005 15:59:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:01:15 -0000 In message: <21291.1123262340@phk.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <42F39E7F.50603@portaone.com>, Maxim Sobolev writes: : >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : >> phk 2005-08-05 16:08:53 UTC : >> : >> FreeBSD src repository : >> : >> Modified files: : >> gnu/usr.bin Makefile : >> Log: : >> let NO_MAN control man : >> let NO_TOOLCHAIN control rcs : > : >I have an objections. rcs is useful thing for various administrative : >tasks as well (i.e. keeping track of config file revisions), therefore : >it is not quite a "toolchain" thing. : : You are free to keep local patches. So are you. That argument cuts both ways. Find a better one :-) Warner