From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 20 12:12:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4D316A47B; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E8F43D88; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBDF2087; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:12:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: none X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D842085; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:11:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D06A33C8D; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:11:59 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Dennis Olvany References: <4495F9A1.8040407@gmail.com> <867j3dwjq3.fsf@xps.des.no> <449691D9.4020704@gmail.com> <86odwputto.fsf@xps.des.no> <4497737D.5020902@gmail.com> <86d5d4upmh.fsf@xps.des.no> <4497E314.1060805@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:11:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4497E314.1060805@gmail.com> (Dennis Olvany's message of "Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:59:16 -0500") Message-ID: <86wtbct4a9.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: David Hoffman , freebsd-user-groups@freebsd.org, thisdayislong , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, ingrid@cityscope.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:12:48 -0000 Dennis Olvany writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: > > You are wrong. The method or process is patentable. A written > > description of the method or process is copyrightable. > > howto change oil > 1. remove oil cap > 2. drain oil > 3. remove filter > 4. etc. > > So, you're saying my little oil change procedure is copyrightable? Yes. > Laughable. I'm sorry you feel that way. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no