From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 2 10:11:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE80E0B0BF for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B8E80565; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.0.1.8] (host81-157-243-97.range81-157.btcentralplus.com [81.157.243.97]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8E7E46BBA; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 06:11:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert N. M. Watson" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: RSS_UDP_IPV4_EX? Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 11:11:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" To: Adrian Chadd References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:11:29 -0000 My recollection here is (quite) hazy, as it's been a while, but it's = likely that this was a transcription error. The set of hash types was = largely modelled on what Chelsio offered in the T3 (if I recall), and = also what was documented in the Microsoft RSS white paper, so it may be = worth taking a look at those sources to see if something makes itself = obvious. (There do seem to be some odd variations in hashing types supported by = various NICs -- e.g., hashing but with different hash algorithms in = certain generations of cards, etc, so it also wouldn't surprise me if it = did correspond to something real. Clearly the comment is not good enough = to explain that, if so!) Robert > On 2 Sep 2017, at 00:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget = the details. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -adrian >=20 >=20 > On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau > wrote: > IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O? Or it was just a mistake. >=20 > Thanks, > sephe >=20 > -- > Tomorrow Will Never Die >=20