From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Nov 24 20:40:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1DBDF0E93 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.wilcox-tech.com [45.32.83.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A6A63BFF for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: (qmail 12836 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2017 20:40:46 -0000 Received: from 107-131-85-28.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.78?) (awilcox@wilcox-tech.com@107.131.85.28) by mail.wilcox-tech.com with ESMTPA; 24 Nov 2017 20:40:46 -0000 Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <20171123152615.GA35498@rdtc.ru> <201711241647.vAOGlgxu071487@fire.js.berklix.net> From: "A. Wilcox" Message-ID: <5A1883CA.3090409@Wilcox-Tech.com> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:40:42 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LgSTeUltd9sTehmaXbt0AdvgCgAsdFRMt" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:40:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LgSTeUltd9sTehmaXbt0AdvgCgAsdFRMt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/11/17 13:19, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, >=20 > Pardon me, but it's 2017 and the 4.3BSD system index isn't an immutable= bible. >=20 > As a general push to packaging things in general, turning fortune into > a package seems like some low hanging fruit. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -adrian This, so much this. Why is it so controversial to put the thing in a package? Why do people want so badly to just remove it? Why wasn't it discussed about putting it in a package? It seems like if, instead of *deleting* things, they were just moved to packages, probably nobody would have complained. Or at least, it would have been fewer people (I wouldn't have), and the complaints would have been lighter ("you could have told me" vs "how dare you"). Live and learn. And please, package it. ALL of it. --arw --=20 A. Wilcox (awilfox) Open-source programmer (C, C++, Python) https://code.foxkit.us/u/awilfox/ --LgSTeUltd9sTehmaXbt0AdvgCgAsdFRMt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaGIPKAAoJEMspy1GSK50UOBIP/RdHJRcQF/hJ5/4oIlwgmgoa zgwXzeqe7RTuBQQy23G0go6CDQAe1iV3rkSI4ZkPKYwzzKH1i2+YZmJeHj/u+IcU /utgpOBO+hVTpV4y9MubN77SjllLQNwN0x2XWdj8/70hATqh331Nqmpu+OeCGoTU h6ImrITQ615YH3LzjuPOFgBWq+LD/mbWdCGm03icW8iNmbZSo74zSID0jkINgK5D zQeT3vVgYXQq29QS6e7/F6KFFHHx6pGzGBkC7vGSa44ho7cJdNK4fOumvPQ2bomA 3HFJ7jKXPNsnctLCjRApebhdTXV8WuXxebBZt7XPCLg3SY6gsxwHy6Y5+KcnHU3T W5vxC+Q+mm8Tk//dCG4kbR8MybbXfRIueSXNHY/gFm1/X8fAcWs0ehbK86iA3BWo fNBijS396zzojBTgiaMiAbyh+Dfkne9c9ozVfGUcrq/GN1snirwmvVaMWKylrqYw kN5VPhid7dxecEwnPVyaP/2x6p28NYgQTn4FOpDS7WjXIAA+pXi4ki7tSNIEHubj iI/Sd5fOIpjjIrZn3vmFTqv8K89g5EoIODZXwKcNKuC28FAb+6zsXP89YY8g9ZmL 3lXorkVXoIPm6qbhH7TSKO1q1jUqA+ZY6ZaFbQEho+IujkDQU2COxmpZ3mgfRVwN 03KD/ghzefBnY3vWHA+6 =LW/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LgSTeUltd9sTehmaXbt0AdvgCgAsdFRMt--