From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 5 18:41:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27E7F1A for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x242.google.com (mail-lb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEB11A1B for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f194.google.com with SMTP id q8so143366lbi.5 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:41:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=96xwrw8oaihycU4/0SGm0LqEsrOEfmNHe/+Z9Hkg1Fk=; b=nKaubGcbOvSpPndqqvb0clffzs2Cp2tPEr4TdPlGSaHbLjIwh/SOJP68X8feEgZBlk uSV+2QbNmhDnGx1dXeYVccP7JjP9rmqr95ZVvVM/Ba9iDU7Pw8aZ8wTv7NP/Scrb43J4 K9TJDA0hviLLS8iKroe33I0aGSoLYbSkAL4EEXoHd3LdfchcIY7d+Of7m0vrqgRkvJqS 9W5gtoViO+j386z97cQSND2shL2OfMb12VgZTJ0zISqh42KwB4KZB+ISVeJqN35JEzZV Bm+CJPSsoDdoESQjYlOrWQFDn/51URssEz+hOykAvhlK99zFwojz1Ii1ZDeK4nvgiA54 M+jw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.153.8.225 with SMTP id dn1mr2110868lad.17.1391625684314; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:41:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.175.231 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:41:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:41:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: opteron a1100 arm From: Dieter BSD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:41:26 -0000 Jim writes: > So I see parity in terms of addressable RAM. Parity is better than nothing (which seems to be what most machines provide these days :-( ), but ECC is much better. :-) Speaking of new machines and ECC, anyone heard any news about an ETA for Berlin? (and mainboards for it that support ECC?) (google finds nothing)