From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Dec 4 16:28:45 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6981311DBC for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E742D80CE9 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A7F6F1311DB8; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514F1311DB7 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EE480CE5 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1783127E2 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wB4GSgr3078043 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wB4GSgcf078041 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:28:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233740] x11/pixman: LLD relocation errors on armv7 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:28:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, toolchain X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E742D80CE9 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.37 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.03)[0.034,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.08)[0.078,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.26)[0.262,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 16:28:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233740 --- Comment #9 from Ed Maste --- (In reply to Charlie Li from comment #8) Indeed, sorry I missed that. > unrecognized reloc 40 Interesting that lld reports the offending relocation (R_ARM_V4BX) w/o -znotext, but just 'reloc 40' with. If convenient can you set LLD_REPRODUCE=3Dpixman.tar in the environment and= try building the failing case? That will leave a reproduction tarball behind th= at can be used to further investigate lld's handling of this. (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #2) > According to src.conf(5) WITH_LLD_IS_LD is default only on armv7 (since 1= 2.0, > its first release) but not arm (v4?) or armv6. Indeed - arm (v4/v5) and armv6 need some additional support in lld that arr= ived after the 6.0 release. Once we have Clang & lld 7.0 in the tree we should be able to test with WITH_LLD_IS_LD for arm & armv6 as well. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=