From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 31 17:34:46 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA08241 for current-outgoing; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 17:34:46 -0800 Received: from eel.dataplex.net (EEL.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.245]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA08226 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 17:34:43 -0800 Received: from [199.183.109.242] (cod [199.183.109.242]) by eel.dataplex.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA00895; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 19:34:17 -0600 X-Sender: rkw@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 19:34:17 -0600 To: Terry Lambert From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: On the (lack of) reliability of CTM Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk At 5:54 PM 10/31/95, Terry Lambert wrote: >How do I sup the CVS tree? I think they are in the process of fixing it so that you simply replace "release=current" with "release=cvs" in the sup files. At least that is the logical way to have it set up. Then someone in power will have to set up your permissions because the cvs tree is by invitation only. >I thought CTM was the only method, but it loses. I too, have noticed frequent lost updates (xxx-cur). What is the weak link that causes mail to get lost? Perhaps we need to add an ftp-by-mail daemon to allow those missing segments to be remailed. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net