From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 13:50:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E861065674 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF098FC13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so2898865dad.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:50:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wey7jbcFwO+x4P9pjz8QprxKKTKP0Y8CY5lnrxB+Fvk=; b=BuR3lHSnqnDErtSrma0q65Cy3MUcRhZ/LzbU3ZcjoL+VldzJeOr19fglHY1eIxKN+0 tUceYpGHq3A48J9/f1jKpoxa4YhpgBAlgLDh6YbLNSIwoEDnvU/pO5Pw5TtmDoi4Hqyr clv/00dttVePsJlQECHyGSy0Qg/VA3a0q6Xz8= Received: by 10.68.73.6 with SMTP id h6mr34358025pbv.116.1326808201163; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:50:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mozolevsky@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.28.199 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:49:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1326756727.23485.10.camel@Arawn> <4F14BAA7.9070707@freebsd.org> <20120117010239.GA29529@richh-imac.office.boxdice.com.au> From: Igor Mozolevsky Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:49:20 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y9VG2MigNDWhwBXyQTS9WeKNA9Q Message-ID: To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:50:02 -0000 On 17 January 2012 13:44, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 17/01/2012 07:32, Atom Smasher wrote: >> >> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, richo wrote: >> >>> This would be a different argument if all the devs were paid a salary. >> >> ============== >> >> what percentage of linux devs are on salary to develop linux? > > Apparently, 3/4: http://apcmag.com/linux-now-75-corporate.htm Actually, you're misrepresenting the facts: according to the headline, 75% of the code came from paid developers, *not* 75% of developers are paid... See the difference?.. -- Igor M.