From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 06:47:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A67A7F; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:47:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward11.mail.yandex.net (forward11.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C494F83; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 81F64E80B7C; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:47:50 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 48062E405AB; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:47:50 +0400 (MSK) Received: from ctsoff2.webstroy.ru (ctsoff2.webstroy.ru [213.27.12.78]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id lneuqBtu-lne8qpTv; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:47:49 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1358232470; bh=82ALIr6lfbQI1NPtaA3Y8h+Elmhq4DQ0Fpz4OSgWYtU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=w35DS2bajFPhZRIE2SlmfTELSLAU+pbm7OjXtk8MTdFgAleoKXWaQ3KfZZcq/wmpp IhrjNWDhBdCnr2oYMwq5pDjPEO5R6uEv3ohdqJcktMgBQk3n/K+1e1X2khUetpO0TZ prwGQE9ctLRdlUoXPgKQCWPx+zL46ULWgONuW0Rs= Message-ID: <50F4FB8A.6090100@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:47:38 +0400 From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130114 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com Subject: Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX References: <50F110AB.1030107@yandex.ru> <50F14880.4090001@yandex.ru> <50F177E9.3040003@yandex.ru> <20130114061553.GA3531@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F3F172.5060903@yandex.ru> <20130115024430.GA3152@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F4F7E6.7070004@yandex.ru> <20130115064011.GA1434@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20130115064011.GA1434@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:47:52 -0000 YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:40: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >>>> YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15: >>>>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >>>>>> Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted an >>>>>> patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got this: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>> I also tried to apply VR_Q_NEEDALIGN quirk, but nothing is changed. Any >>>>>> hints? >>>>> >>>>> I recall D-Link was one of notorious vendor which used to >>>>> completely change its chip set in later revisions without notice. So >>>>> I'm afraid the controller you have may not be a VIA manufactured >>>>> one. >>>>> Could you take a picture of the chip set of controller and let >>>>> others see it? I guess it could be a RealTek 8139 or 8139C+. >>>> >>>> Here they are. Both front and back for the case (see no traces of >>>> RealTek though): >>>> >>>> http://s2.postimage.org/9nvkrlpqx/IMAG1040.jpg >>>> http://s2.postimage.org/4qi06hnrt/IMAG1041.jpg >>> >>> Thanks. Try attached patch and let me know how it works. >>> If that patch does not work, try setting a loader tunable like the >>> following. >>> dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 >> >> Terrific! It's now attaching fine, but network over it doesn't seems >> working (can't ping/access machine via this interface): > > Please use my patch. I think rl(4) is the right driver for your > controller. Jeremie's patch forces re(4) to attach. To be honest, your and Jeremie patches are identical. Your patch is against if_re/if_rlreg.h too :) >> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=8209b >> ether 90:94:e4:82:d5:e6 >> inet 192.168.0.208 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 >> inet6 fe80::9294:e4ff:fe82:d5e6%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >> nd6 options=29 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> >> re0@pci0:4:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x11031186 chip=0x42001186 >> rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'D-Link System Inc' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> I also tried to add dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 to /boot/loader.conf with no >> difference. I'll try to experiment with this later this day when there >> will be no active users on this machine, then let you know the results. > > It's not a valid option when you use re(4). > >> Thank you! Yes, it was unmindful copy/paste, sorry. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.