From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 1 06:44:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2FF16A47B for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org [64.147.160.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E91E643CB9 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: (qmail 48449 invoked by uid 1001); 1 Dec 2006 06:44:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:44:26 -0800 From: David Thiel To: Max Khon Message-ID: <20061201064426.GK30063@redundancy.redundancy.org> Mail-Followup-To: Max Khon , David Thiel , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200611302127.kAULRTM4071848@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061201054050.GB46045@samodelkin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061201054050.GB46045@samodelkin.net> X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, David Thiel , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/edict-utf-8 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:44:09 -0000 On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:40:50AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > > Modified files: > > japanese/edict-utf-8 Makefile > > Log: > > Move unzip to EXTRACT_DEPENDS rather than BUILD_DEPENDS. > > > > Approved by: edwin (mentor) > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.33 +1 -1 ports/japanese/edict-utf-8/Makefile > > Why not just use USE_ZIP=yes? An excellent suggestion. I'll throw that in with the next portversion bump, which should be in about a month. Thanks, David