From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Feb 1 11:10:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17155 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17113; Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:10:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802011910.LAA17113@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Subject: Re: docs/5614: Typos in ifconfig(8) and ep(4) man pages Reply-To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" The following reply was made to PR docs/5614; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Steve Price Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/5614: Typos in ifconfig(8) and ep(4) man pages Date: 01 Feb 1998 20:06:20 +0100 Steve Price writes: > IO address 0x110 is indeed correct. See a recent discussion > in -hackers (IIRC), PR kern/4459, and the comments Joerg Wunsch > added in revision 1.22 of if_epreg.h by way of Justin Gibbs manual > on the 3c509. Ah, I see. elink.h defines ELINK_ID_PORT to 0x100, hence the confusion. But how do you explain the problems I experienced (namely, "ep0 not found at 0x340" and "3c5x9 board(s) found at 0x220, 0x220, 0x220...") which disappeared when I mapped my SB32 to 0x108 instead of 0x100? -- * Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 * RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send"