Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:22:18 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 Message-ID: <81946725@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> (Edwin Groothuis's message of "Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:50 %2B1000") References: <200605190910.k4J9AthA057344@freefall.freebsd.org> <24823738@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519102325.GF1116@k7.mavetju> <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 May 2006 21:02:50 +1000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:59:39PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2006 20:23:25 +1000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:25:25PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > On Fri, 19 May 2006 09:10:55 GMT Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > > > > > > > Synopsis: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 > > > > > > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-emulation > > > > > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > > > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 19 09:10:54 UTC 2006 > > > > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > > > > Over to maintainer > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97488 > > > > > > > > Shouldn't it be assigned to portmgr@?: > > > > > If the maintainer approves of it. > > > > Thanks for your answer, but some questions are left. > > > > I'm not sure who is treated as a maintainer. Isn't it netchild, who > > filed this PR? Or am I not understanding the procedure? Is it needed > > to be approved from the email address freebsd-emulation@? > The ports Makefile says: the maintainers email address is > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org. Big problem here, that's not a real > person. But how can a script know this? It was a script who I was talking to! :-) Thanks, now it's clear. > If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in > my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild@. In the mean time > (and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know > how to assign this PR back to himself :-) Yea, I suppose so. :-) BTW, I agree with Alexander, maybe we may consider a new PR class "repocopy"? Then the script will assign this sort of PRs to the submitter (which is the right way, as I understand) but not the maintainer. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81946725>