From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  3 13:37:00 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1167716A401;
	Wed,  3 May 2006 13:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BFC43D48;
	Wed,  3 May 2006 13:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k43DavLj024863;
	Wed, 3 May 2006 17:36:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:36:57 +0400 (MSD)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: Tor Egge <tegge@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605022352.k42Nqi1s095377@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060503172526.H98950@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <200605022352.k42Nqi1s095377@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 03 May 2006 17:36:57 +0400 (MSD)
Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:37:00 -0000

Dear Tor,

On Tue, 2 May 2006, Tor Egge wrote:

TE>   Modified files:
TE>     sys/ufs/ffs          ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c 
TE>   Log:
TE>   Close a race when VOP_LOCK() on a snapshot file is attempted at the
TE>   same time as it is changed back into a normal file.  The locker would
TE>   get the shared "snaplk" lock which would no longer be the correct lock
TE>   for the vnode.

Any chance this (and subsequent) change(s) would fix snaplk errors reported by 
me? How can I help testing (patch applied cleanly, but I hesitate to test it 
blindly ;)

Thanks!

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------