Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:41:46 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.i386 Message-ID: <20021208014146.GA1987@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20021207192114.A82142-100000@blues.jpj.net> References: <20021208001908.GA1774@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20021207192114.A82142-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:15:49PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>
> It sounds as though you plan to implement this in a way which won't create
> duplicates of all the .alpha.rpm and .i386.rpm files. If so, I'm all for
> it.
There can never be duplication for the arch specific RPMs because
*.alpha.rpm and *.i386.rpm are two independent and seperate sets
of entities.
The following implements what I suggest:
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -r1.70 Makefile
--- Makefile 3 Dec 2002 06:45:56 -0000 1.70
+++ Makefile 8 Dec 2002 01:39:36 -0000
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
BUILD_DEPENDS= rpm:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= alpha i386
-DIST_SUBDIR= rpm
+DIST_SUBDIR= rpm-${MACHINE_ARCH}
PREFIX= ${LINUXBASE}
EXTRACT_ONLY=
NO_BUILD= yes
> In the meantime, it would be best if the port were restored to a more
> usable state. IMO its breakage is the greater inconvenience.
Fair enough. I didn't want to apply the above patch because we're
too close to release to mess with DIST_SUBDIR gratuitously...
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021208014146.GA1987>