From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 18:07:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460F8106566B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from syshackmin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CDD8FC14 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkat8 with SMTP id t8so2814631bka.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:07:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=507FNawEsRlYz5IxUHIxApYLdeLVr1VR9qrt6AGdJqU=; b=AgI+kFCZhAEpT9ah2G9pV7Nt9c7F56L08koB2RgseuKTNgR+Obtpr2pXMKjwYG4QGZ ctb+73wYIhpGcmT0sBcj4j6FyEq56+uo2P0LYjQ/SvxJenJ4vdZaET+YEcM8EW7DyvUC BA3DVlbEXuBLWG65Y4JEnjXVrD7ly8pIALQsE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.135.22 with SMTP id l22mr42989bkt.393.1314898969988; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:42:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.68.68 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:42:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:42:49 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Cundiff To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS V28 on 8.2-RELEASE write behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:07:42 -0000 > >> Any help tracking this down would be greatly appreciated. >> > > There have been numerous changes to v28 in -STABLE since June. > Can you reproduce the behavior with a recent build of -STABLE instead of > -RELEASE? Perhaps even on -CURRENT? > I can sure give that a try. I'm 95% sure my ZFS code is pretty up to date compared to stable. I dug through svn-src-stable-8 for anything ZFS related and only caught 1 patch that, though severe, is not a feature I'm currently using. The rest are either minor functionality that I don't use, memory saving of which I have tons, or cosmetic. Granted any patches to the OS that didn't involve a directory/file with ZFS or CDDL in it I would definitely have missed. -- Dave Cundiff System Administrator A2Hosting, Inc http://www.a2hosting.com