From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 20:24:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB016A4CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:24:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBE943D58 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:24:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [10.1.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j2VKOKsf053156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:24:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2VKNlhs015593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:23:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2VKNlKD004981; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:23:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j2VKNlGC004980; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:23:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:23:46 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20050331202346.GH2072@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050331133331.04d109d0@64.7.153.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050331133331.04d109d0@64.7.153.2> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on cicely12.cicely.de cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uftdi serial adaptors X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:24:25 -0000 On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:25:28PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I got a couple of USB to rs232 Serial adaptors from bytrunner today to try > out, and they dont seem to be recognized > > usbdevs -v shows > port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 90 mA, config 1, USB FAST SERIAL > ADAPTER(0x6010), FTDI(0x0403), rev 5.00 The FT232AM and FT232BM have product ID 0x6001. Maybe a typo when programming the config eeprom. You can rewrite the config eeprom from the adapter with misc/ftdi-eeprom - or with FTDIs own version for Windows from their site www.ftdichip.com. Or is this a twin port device? In this case it may be one of the newer FT2232 chips. We don't have special support for this variant yet, but it would be great if you have one, so I have someone to do tests. Do you know the chip type inside the adapter? > and it defaults to ugen > > [hifn]# kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 7 0xc0400000 4b4564 kernel > 2 1 0xc08b5000 326c uftdi.ko > 3 2 0xc08b9000 36e8 ucom.ko > 4 16 0xc08bd000 61d48 acpi.ko > [hifn]# > > This is HEAD from March 30th. Is there an easy way to hack in support for > this variant ? Or is it a totally different device that requires a > different driver ? FTDI devices share the same driver layout. There are additional features in newwer chips, but they have always been backward compatible. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de