From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 06:13:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F7437B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.lcn.biz (smtp.lcn.biz [195.82.107.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D42943F75 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simond@irrelevant.org) Received: from [193.195.31.182] (helo=simon.lcn.biz) by smtp.lcn.biz with asmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19Ipsc-0003kj-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 14:13:10 +0100 From: Simon Dick To: Anti In-Reply-To: <20030521162833.1b29ab37.fearow@attbi.com> References: <20030521163251.4791137B404@hub.freebsd.org> <3.0.5.32.20030521124011.01379c70@sage-one.net> <20030521162833.1b29ab37.fearow@attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1053609305.9269.2.camel@simon.lcn.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 22 May 2003 14:15:06 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: sdf@expertune.com Subject: Re: shutdown -p now X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 13:13:15 -0000 On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 22:28, Anti wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:40:11 -0500 > "Jack L. Stone" wrote: > > > >My experience has been just the reverse. > > > > > >shutdown -p now > > > > > >did not work on 4.x > > >does work on 5.0 > > > > > >I love 5.0. > > > > I don't want to start a fuss, but your comment about 4.x not working is > > misleading to the list. It's okay to say that it didn't work for you, but > > it was not because 4.x doesn't support the shutdown IF properly configured > > and IF the computer supports it too. > > > > I know you said "My experience...." but might imply 4.x won't work. > > in my experience 4.x cannot power down, even with apm in the kernel, while > 5.x can out of the box... I've had 4.x powering down using -p since around 4.2 or something like that. It must be your setup ;)