From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 14:51:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862F73ED; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32C2205D; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gl10so3778899lab.12 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MuyiV+EyhnLHm8Dvo+77CunOnSeiifyyhLrf7a/5Jgg=; b=ttR4imc4RpEzf6NY6OlPFFeVXIIGB+WEa7zyF/ctmIMEVRfj/HXOCozQdP23cjEDbj t6RQ3YFIybUV+BW72V2eLXrm9IlOM6FCDkRZEPZE3WMIQ3tXy5XaqwlHnxlBJNmf2j2Z G36qTMTyD2Hk552cReuFhbjxhtqdNyRmQVfi7NuJ61u8moaf/wYJ5/19XA9ALrb1fjwv FZpIwJdHhwRMfgc84PjNEddAQruJneeVHCm9VV79BNJBoRfNysPQNq3+WmEWGVEceJk6 3EI/LfS1ClXt/ZY6XcqkySEZZBe6BaN+aICrffrF68zw3paqhbTo4rbn7rCnFluHjnUx jMvw== X-Received: by 10.152.164.70 with SMTP id yo6mr23792407lab.2.1408287059767; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc5.home (abpi45.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.8.50.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm8741756lah.20.2014.08.17.07.50.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Aug 2014 07:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:50:59 +0200 From: Edward Tomasz =?utf-8?Q?Napiera=C5=82a?= To: Hans Ottevanger Subject: Re: [CFT] Autofs. Message-ID: <20140817145059.GA5497@pc5.home> Mail-Followup-To: Hans Ottevanger , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org References: <20140730071933.GA20122@pc5.home> <53F0878E.3000401@beastielabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <53F0878E.3000401@beastielabs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:51:02 -0000 On 0817T1244, Hans Ottevanger wrote: > On 07/30/14 09:19, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: > >At the link below you will find a patch that adds the new automounter. > >The patch is against yesterdays 11.0-CURRENT. > > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~trasz/autofs-head-20140729.diff > > > >Slides that explain the project scope and deliverables are here: > > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~trasz/autofs.pdf > > > >Testing is welcome. Please start with manual pages, eg. automount(8). > >Note that you need not only to rebuild both kernel and world, but also > >to run mergemaster, to install required /etc files. To run at startup, > >add 'autofs_enable="YES"' to /etc/rc.conf. > > > >This project is being sponsored by FreeBSD Foundation. > > > > Hi! > > Great to see a real autofs finally coming to FreeBSD. > > I already did some very cursory testing on a recent 11-CURRENT system > that I still happened to have and things with at least the /net map > look quite OK. > > I could do some more extensive testing if I could use some of my > 10-STABLE systems. I already checked that the patch applies cleanly > to a recent 10-STABLE (modulo a few offsets) and that both buildworld > and buildkernel succeed. Should I expect difficulties actually > running your autofs on 10-STABLE? No, it should be fine. Plan is to MFC this to 10 soon, btw. > And do you plan support for NIS? I know NIS is quite dead and has > been so for at least 20 years, but I still see it being used > occasionally (probably most out of habit) and it is (still ?) > available in the base-system. It should be trivial to add, I just need someone with such setup (autofs maps in NIS) to test it against.