From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 13 23:47:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5404C37B413 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 23:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g5E6lpY14998; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:47:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5E6loG47100; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:47:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:47:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20020614.004743.27325725.imp@village.org> To: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: marcel@xcllnt.net Subject: Re: Standardized make options (or no doesn't always mean no) From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20020609101333.A26546@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3D02E881.2F3F57CB@mindspring.com> <20020609072725.GA47864@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020609101333.A26546@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20020609101333.A26546@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : [please take care to NOT CC me, I do read arch@] : : On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: : > Also, I believe in earlier discussions NO_BLA was in favor by most of : > the people involved, but I can be wrong here (too). : : You are correct. I estimate this discussion was 2 years ago now. : Everyone except BDE (and maybe a few others) wanted NOFOO, all the rest : wanted NO_FOO. In June 2000, Kris Kennaway made a set of patches to : change most everything to NO_. I think you ment that everybody wanted NO_FOO, except bde and a couple others. They wanted to retain the traditional NOFOO. NO_FOO is the new standard. We didn't do the cutover in 2000 because it was deemed too disruptive for folks that have 4.x and current builds on the same box. With the ability to set make.conf on a per-build basis now, that's a moot point. I can see no real reason for not completing the cutover, except manpower. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message