Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:04:49 -0700 From: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local> In-Reply-To: <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I suppose it doesn't matter to you that sendmail is actually > maintained by Greg Shapiro, VP, CTO of Sendmail, Inc. While I appreciate the vote of confidence, it doesn't, and it shouldn't. I'll continue to maintain sendmail in the base as long as it is welcome there. If the project wants it moved out, that is not up to me (though I hope it stays). I haven't spent a lot of time looking at DMA, but some requirements that pop to mind for it to be a replacement would be things like accepting local mail via SMTP (e.g., for MUAs which use SMTP submission) and supporting STARTTLS and SMTP AUTH for talking to the upstream MTA.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090922200449.GL19207>