From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Sep  7 22:29:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA07635
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 22:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yang.cpac.washington.edu (yang.cpac.washington.edu [128.95.152.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA07625
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 22:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yang.cpac.washington.edu
	(8.6.9/internet->uucp gateway 2.4.2) id WAA20103; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 22:29:34 -0700
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 22:29:34 -0700
Message-Id: <199709080529.WAA20103@yang.cpac.washington.edu>
From: Ken McGlothlen <mcglk@yang.cpac.washington.edu>
To: <andrew@ugh.net.au>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tcsh, stty, and other oddities.
References: <199709070921.CAA16958@yang.cpac.washington.edu>
	<Pine.BSF.3.96.970908124002.5317B-100000@depravitas.tuu.utas.edu.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

andrew@ugh.net.au (andrew@ugh.net.au) writes:

| In my experience NCSA Telnet for MAc is _extremely_ buggy. 2.7 was far
| better than 2.6 but try Better Telnet (basically NCSA 2.7 with bug fixes)
| or Nifty Telnet.

If it were just NCSA Telnet, that'd be okay, but it also does the same thing
in other clients as well.  I just wish I knew why the identical setup works
fine on one, and not the other.  Ah, well.

I'll try Better Telnet, or find Nifty Telnet, but it's not the same as a fix.
:l  Thanks, though.

				---Ken McGlothlen
				   mcglk@serv.net
				   mcglk@cpac.washington.edu