From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 17 18:41:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B4B6516A4CE; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC02743D46; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:41:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org)
Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id BA9FCBA15; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:40:34 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:40:33 +0000
From: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@tcbug.org>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20031217204033.GB7146@ns1.tcbug.org>
References: <20031217141537.GB6618@ns1.tcbug.org>
	<20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031217233414.GA658@arthur.nitro.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docproj port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:41:08 -0000

On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:34:21AM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2003.12.17 14:15:38 +0000, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > I noticed that there is now a couple of new docproj ports, one with jadetex 
> > and one without...I'm wondering if the fdp should be updated to reflect the 
> > new ports, as the old docproj port appears to be depreciated, or at the very 
> > least no longer needed.
> 
> The two "new" ports docproj-jadetex and docproj-nojadetex are just
> metaports that set the JADETEX make variable to either "yes" or "no" and
> then include the docproj port.  The docproj port is not depreciated, two
> to meta ports are just there to make it simpler to install the docproj
> port.

Great.

> If you think the FDP should tell people about the two "new" ports you
> chould submit a patch :-).
> -- 
>
>
> Simon L. Nielsen
> FreeBSD Documentation Team

I'll have it submitted by tomorrow. :)

Josh Paetzel