Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:15:15 +0100 From: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Niall Smart <niall@pobox.com>, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Various Questions Message-ID: <37B2E503.B6A3C229@baker.ie> References: <2225.934453793@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But what happens if you write a program which does whatever ioctl is > > required to unpromiscify an interface and run it on an unpromiscuous > > interface, does it print a message to syslog even though promiscuous > > mode was never enabled in the first place? > > Like I said, I seem to get the intended behaviour. > > vty1 -> start trafshow > Aug 12 12:26:41 axl /kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode enabled > vty2 -> start trafshow > vty1 -> kill trafshow > vty2 -> kill trafshow > Aug 12 12:27:22 axl /kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode disabled > > :-) If everything works ok , howabout one of the developers commits this modification to /sys/net/if.c ? - Cillian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37B2E503.B6A3C229>