From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 5 22:29:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9B3106566B for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2918FC12 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nB5MSJj9051193; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:28:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:29:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:28:59 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: krad Message-ID: <20091205222859.GA49341@thought.org> References: <20091205064419.GA46204@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 23 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: which filrs/directories must be chowned bind? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:29:04 -0000 On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:09:24PM +0000, krad wrote: > 2009/12/5 Gary Kline > > > > > I've just finished getting > > > > % nslookup 10.47.0.230 > > > > to respond, so at least my test configuration is finally right > > ... or on the right track. I am not certain that I ever had > > things chowned bind:bind; even before my '07 meltdown. Now > > it's time to make certain that every file that should be owned > > by bind really *is*. > > > > Anybody? > > > > > Have a look at /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist > also dont use nslookup use host or dig. NSlookup is dodgy Re nslookup, it is still widely enough used that it ain't dead yet. But, yeah, I just found a tutorial-like page on dig. It's helpful for a utility that isn't that friendly. thanks for the mtree tip. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 7.31a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php