a256; cv=none;
	b=pQzMNRSS6Z9XDrfm9NE4wEqvYA9uOivad72JY24xY8W2Koj79t8TMzbdZhzMt7Ga5gfr1d
	KRLiY5A8U7JQdJhPJ8HWsauBdyl7fb665ueZonR1LZjEN4tHeAwVdfCI4xJKW89VWqatiN
	gg4/kk/gMe58n66iulGYOl14GIaYvG6+62fRtdTVuyyI5oRCr95IPiKaKir+VzWoeXGCtt
	YQpDHTFsAQjTjEbyqU3gih6tab9pb+ftZu7hj9GyT86Ynkoyhlck2TRLk3SVJxfuOoMSK5
	DMIfPOdqiFPObF5feXqkp1mZRupvZN+Srkfgm9g0moNOO0lIio6kk0XP4maylA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dqRXv5011z53m
	for <ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5])
	by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 60C9EtXd023592
	for <ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:14:55 GMT
	(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: (from www@localhost)
	by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 60C9EtRD023591
	for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:14:55 GMT
	(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 292379] net-mgmt/vmutils: Consider renaming port
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:14:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: michaelo@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: danfe@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform
 op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 flagtypes.name
Message-ID: <bug-292379-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs
List-Help: <mailto:ports-bugs+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports-bugs+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports-bugs+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D292379

            Bug ID: 292379
           Summary: net-mgmt/vmutils: Consider renaming port
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: danfe@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: michaelo@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(danfe@FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: danfe@FreeBSD.org

While the port seems totally fine, the name is confusing because 'vm' is al=
most
always connected to virtual machines and not Victoria Metrics. Please consi=
der
give it a better name: net-mgmt/victoria-metrics-utils. Due to the size it
cannot be folded in the the parent port.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=