From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue May 25 21:27: 9 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A1B15051
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 25 May 1999 21:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12193;
	Tue, 25 May 1999 21:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Geff Hanoian <boing@boing.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 May 1999 21:23:50 PDT."
             <199905260423.VAA06856@kusanagi.boing.com> 
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:28:04 -0700
Message-ID: <12189.927692884@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> little kids.  But, perhaps people that aren't holding on so tight
> should be the first level of "support" so to speak?  Has that been
> considered?

That's questions@freebsd.org and where most folks asking questions
should stay, but still they wander into more developer-oriented
mailing lists like -current and -stable and then some developers chew
on them a little.  We direct them to -questions, every bit of
documentation we have points to -questions, but still some guys just
*insist* on ignoring the advice and doing the equivalent of walking
through Chicago's south side at 3am.  There's just no protecting such
people. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message