From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 13:13:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12D9106566C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:13:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hardware@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5218FC18 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6jM7-0002Fy-PJ for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:07 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:07 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:57:55 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <22830765.20110404101040@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <22830765.20110404101040@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Advanced disk format at WD20EARS: what should "camcontrol identify" show? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:13:11 -0000 On 04/04/2011 08:10, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Alexander. > > I'm replacing old WD500AAKS HDDs in my (software) RAID5 with new > WD20EARS, which are advanced format. And speed is terrible. RAID5 > rebuilding shows about 8MiB/s (55MiB/s is typical speed for old AAKSes)... > > I'm affraid, that my HDD is in some strange mode with 512 byte > sectors emulation: With such drives, everything must be 4 KiB-aligned : the RAID stripes, the partitions / slices and the file system / block size. This is the only way to get good performance. If you just replace a non-4K drive in a RAID5 with a 4K drive, it is very likely that there would be alignment problems with that drive.