From nobody Tue Dec 13 19:02:05 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NWntP17Rkz4kWh9 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (mail-pg1-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NWntN1bJCz4Jxx; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 19:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com; dmarc=none Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 142so490197pga.1; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:02:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=u26dz0Bhe+yuygzpBlrzN5Z1H2ZeLi6oyiwVD3FeGsg=; b=FnJGtFlpZ0M+HWNULAi9PkAXPqpsB3ztw6TQgATYVWLBjNE3vKZpljYb+BSh7wcdkD 0OvARKjN+g4MmMtp0W9rVareT1I49hP13cP/x+uyK79D/qT1qHX2nLpD3ml1mhikWf5n c//xkRc0hRefvvvWYTyUsTiDbiKpAbBpPLPdTxRMylv7NeZXKDByMq5SB32cITxEMCsl 8EVGL1bFP4kS9egfQNctkXl/72n/e5jHPz4QGnjniy2gNtMoQUV57k6RJFptNHlEzP+m lvJ8e9MM2Suet85vuagnHpJGTK6C17wjaXGbCHc9DFS43x2cdtOrYR2B4l6D+l5itowI B66A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl+KrNLhWSoH38lXxOvI7Ooy0B7Likn6sUaSLsmq63Vhouqtgb4 314Zl+7xRvHMPfkkSGuWV0XH/n0ikKvifBSw25XfohrRdnk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6rhSHSG4egHRzUrWa2LCCo3x4x+ZbzQBoUeT3xowzqu05pb48Y610y+Pv43LxrFfeA39bOisPMjbX7sWZpOsE= X-Received: by 2002:a63:2226:0:b0:478:54e2:ecb1 with SMTP id i38-20020a632226000000b0047854e2ecb1mr37717270pgi.550.1670958137930; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:02:17 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211215162538.99d8d81650af56e2276f2f88@bidouilliste.com> <20211215175202.e1d101079a9c22c9094577f3@bidouilliste.com> <20211216101733.7b7bfa569aca496b22ef0324@bidouilliste.com> <20211216161337.1fa53758e61eaeb37b8b24d0@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ? To: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: Warner Losh , Emmanuel Vadot , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.51)[-0.512]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[209.85.215.180:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.215.180:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NWntN1bJCz4Jxx X-Spamd-Bar: - X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 11:49, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > So I'm fine with removal [of ce, cp drivers] if anybody demonstrates > me a non-zero cost of leaving the drivers in. I just found PR264160: likely heap overflow in driver for Cronyx [ce(4), cp(4)] adapters (others also possibly affected) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264160 although it was submitted some time ago. I am not sure if it's a real issue or not.